Going
to Graceland
Dave Urbanski
Vital Youth Ministry Elements
Youthworker, September/October 1999
Though definitions are likely to
differ somewhat, a "church within a church"
is exactly what it sounds like—a separate congregation
within a larger, main congregation. Its mission is to
exist as the church for a group or subculture that the
main church cannot reach as effectively.
This concept has gained momentum in recent years, as
evidenced by more and more congregations that have adopted
it as a mission and ministry. Most of these churches-within-churches
are trying to reach young people—postmoderns,
busters, Xers. And due to the number of non-Christians
in these target groups, the "church within a church"
ideal often tends toward evangelism as much as worship
or fellowship.
The following is a conversation with Dan Kimball, a
former youth worker who pastors Graceland—the
"church within a church" at Santa Cruz (Calif.)
Bible Church.
YOUTHWORKER: What led you to explore the "church
within a church" idea?
DAN KIMBALL: I led the high school youth group from
1990 to 1997, and we did the big-bang, midweek kind
of thing with 300 kids. We also did a traditional Sunday
youth gathering, which ran like a more serious youth
church. We did dramas, videos—the works. But here’s
what struck me—it was a fluke, actually. In the
summer of 1995, we started holding services where we
unplugged the instruments and lit candles—I thought
we were being original! (laughs) But I was seeing something
different—"harder" kids were participating.
I thought we needed to use gizmos and gimmicks, but
kids were responding to stripped-down, raw stuff.
After that, the idea of a reaching these kids through
a service they could call their own haunted me. You
see, we have a very gifted senior pastor and very modern
church services, but apart from the most serious kids,
high schoolers weren’t making the transition into
the life of the main church—which really isn’t
uncommon at all.
So Graceland began as a specific ministry and community
for them, so they could continue together in their spiritual
growth. But by the fall of 1996, we sensed that something
even more different and radical was needed because of
the postmodern shift that was taking place in youth
culture. So we developed a new, unique church service
and distinct community designed for those who identify
with this cultural transition by using different approaches
in communication, leadership, atmosphere, worship style,
and ministry methodology. We launched on September 14,
1997.
How does Graceland operate in the context of the
main church?
KIMBALL: Graceland meets twice on Sunday evenings and
is considered a full church service and ministry, but
it’s not like a church plant—it’s
not designed to split off and become its own entity.
Graceland remains within the Santa Cruz Bible Church
body and is under its authority and leadership.
The relationship is really beneficial in many ways.
There’s no need to find a new building, first
of all. We immediately had use of all the church’s
facilities. We also receive the benefit of the church’s
support staff, such as receptionists and custodians.
The custodians, for example, help us set up the sanctuary
for our services.
We take an offering as well, and all the finances are
overseen and distributed by the church financial director—so
we’re accountable in that way. But it’s
more like a separate church in that throughout the week
we meet in small groups, and we perform baptisms and
have regular communion.
So...do the Graceland services resemble large youth
gatherings?
KIMBALL: Not exactly. We’ve always opened the
service to all ages—and it now includes married
couples, children, even parents. I’m seeing more
and more parents who come and sit with their kids so
they can learn about what we do. Really the Graceland
service is for anybody of any age who identifies with
postmodern culture—and that doesn’t necessarily
mean just people under the age of 30.
Doesn’t this fragment the church?
KIMBALL: No, but it’s definitely a new way of
looking at how a church operates. We’ve tried
to focus on how we can actively integrate the communities
of the church together. We had an all-church Memorial
Day picnic, and everybody was invited to that. But even
more, we encourage intergenerational relationships and
ministry sharing—Graceland people serve in other
parts of Santa Cruz Bible Church, such as the youth
ministry, and people who attend the main church serve
in the Graceland community. Older members of the church,
for instance, have been extremely helpful and needed,
doing things like leading Graceland home groups and
mentoring younger people. So maybe an older person doesn’t
feel comfortable worshiping at the Graceland service,
but that person will work with the young people, mentoring
them. And then a 21-year-old person who doesn’t
go to the main church might contribute to non-Graceland
ministries by being a junior high helper.
How many youth group kids come to Graceland?
KIMBALL: About 75 percent of the church’s high
schoolers do. We’ve grown to more than 800 now—and
we’re still getting teenagers in. We’re
also seeing new teens who’re not part of any church
and those who’d dropped out of church.
What’s different about the Graceland services?
KIMBALL: We’ll ask ourselves, "What does
the environment speak when you walk through the door?"
The Graceland sanctuary is dark and lit with candles.
There are stained glass images on screens. In the modern
church, many have removed the visual—but we want
to bring that back.
A Campus Crusade leader from down south told me that
Graceland seems the exact opposite of the typical seeker-sensitive,
megachurch. There are no gimmicks. No Top-10 countdowns.
It seems the more spiritual we get, the more response
we get. All the comments I hear are that young people
want more of the raw, spiritual, mystical aspects to
church. The worship band will sometimes play from the
back of the sanctuary and not the front, or in front
for the beginning and in back for the second half, after
the message—but always on the floor, for a cummunity
feel. At that point we just have two crosses we built
facing front, and that’s all people see—besides
the lyrics. And the second half worship is extended.
We also have a poet’s corner set up, and during
many of our services—instead of me doing a reading—the
person in the poet’s corner will. Others may tell
stories behind old hymns before they’re sung.
We’ll display visual art, have responsive readings,
and sometimes read ancient creeds out loud.
We want to communicate that Christianity is an ancient
thing, because kids tend to mistrust modern conventions.
So while we’ll use Power Point for lyrics, we
won’t have anything else.
Your Web site says Graceland is geared to "new
generations...for thousands and thousands of those who’ve
been raised with no biblical background and may not
normally attend a church service." How do you approach
evangelism?
KIMBALL: We just spent four weeks teaching the Bible
as "food for the soul," and there was great
response to it. We discussed hard questions in an open
forum: Where did the Bible come from? Was it divinely
inspired? Can we trust it? We even had a seminary professor
come in, and people turned in questions.
I believe the church has been somewhat wrong for making
the Bible so easy to read. I mean, there are verses
in church bulletins, verses on screens—everything
geared for our ease, to the point where a lot of people
don’t bring their Bibles to church anymore. We
take the Bible seriously at Graceland. We talk about
hell, Satan, all the controversial topics.
Don’t a lot of churches do that?
KIMBALL: Yes, but not in a postmodern context. For example,
we leave mystery involved and let people wrestle with
concepts instead of giving them the answers. There’s
a greater emphasis on really knowing why you believe
what you believe—but without a set of easy, systematic
answers for every mystery of the faith.
The modern approach to Christianity is based on propositional
truth—in other words, "This is truth, and
let’s open the Bible, and I’ll show you
why this is the truth." The postmodern approach
is walking them through a process of discovering the
truth on their own—and not telling them they’re
wrong, but having a real, Socratic dialogue. I’ll
say, "If I’m wrong, please let me know. Show
me reasons why." It’s like Paul in Acts 17,
taking people back to the beginning and reasoning with
them. It’s a back and forth thing.
What have been some of the more significant struggles
in getting Graceland off the ground?
KIMBALL: In the beginning it was defining what it is
and how it fits in with rest of the church. Dealing
with questions like, "Is this just a passing phase,
and then they’ll grow up and go to the other service?"
But one of the major roadblocks with the "church
within a church" model is conflict with the senior
pastor. Because unless the senior pastor sees that something
else needs to be done to reach young people, unless
the senior pastor sees the new body as a missional venture,
it won’t work. That’s the key. And our senior
pastor sees this.
And for most of the people at Graceland, Chip [Ingram]
is not the primary vision caster—although he does
come to the Graceland services three times a year to
preach. So his humility is key—and the health
of my relationship with him is very important. I don’t
let anything that I’m thinking or feeling build
up without saying something to him, and he does the
same.
Another thing is that we didn’t want the other
staffers in the church, being so immersed in their own
ministries, having a difficult time understanding what
Graceland is. So we brought in Doug Pagitt from Leadership
Network (www.leadnet.org), and he spoke to the whole
staff so that everybody understood the cultural change
and why a new type of service was needed.
It’s a shame that when churches "get older,"
all the young people and younger famalies leave and
go to the new, hot church in town. With the "church
within a church model" model, that’s not
necessary. And the whole thing with youth pastors feeling
as though they need to become college pastors or senior
pastors to keep their careers alive? That’s not
necessary with this model, either. Because you know
the group and the culture your’re ministering
to, you stay with them—as you get older and your
people get older. I wish more youth pastors would consider
this.
More Stuff
What Leaders of Santa Cruz Bible Church Say about Graceland
In my mind, if you say as a church you're committed
to reaching lost people, and you do it in a way that's
biblical, you're shaped by the giftedness of the people
God's brought to you. With Dan, I thought, "Here's
a guy who's 35 and gifted in reaching postmoderns. I
know I'm not the person who's going to reach them. And
we're going to lose them if we don't let Dan dream his
dreams." So Graceland was not a big leap.
And we decided that a clearly generational church produces
more problems than it solves—which is why Graceland
is more mindset-targeted than generationally targeted.
So we made it the fourth service and the fifth service,
with the idea that it would model biblical relationships
between generations—that older men and women would
teach younger men and women. In fact, almost all of
the Graceland Bible studies are led by baby boomers—moms
and dads. It's really interesting.
Integration is very important, too. Last Easter was
a good example. We decided that we'd integrate both
services into one, so the Graceland people and the main
church people came together and dreamed it up. It was
very avant garde, people dressed in black, doing readings
from the Bible that sounded like John Paul Satre in
a '50s coffeehouse! But there was also an orchestra
and a brass quintet—it was a highly creative collage.
And 250 came to Christ. Yet it was so Graceland-oriented
that it pushed the church in general too far past our
limits. For me—and others—it was weird.
For the postmoderns, it was meaningful.
We don't exactly know where Graceland is going. Maybe,
as the people who go to Graceland get older and Dan
gets older, they'll need to reinvent themselves. Or
maybe in 10 years there'll be a need for a new service
that'll attract post-high schoolers more effectively
than Graceland.
For this model to work, I think pastors have to decide
whether or not they believe Ephesians 4 and Romans 12.
If they do, then success is not focusing on how many
people think you're the hot shot, it's equipping your
leaders to help others grow. That's the calling. It's
not about who gets credit. At Graceland, Dan's the man—I
don't think there's anyone who can reach them like Dan
can. I'm like an old coach—I just like to win.
—Chip Ingram is the senior pastor of Santa Cruz
Bible Church
I started here in February, so I'm pretty new to the
church—but it helps that I already have a bent
toward Gen-Xers. A lot of our students are invovled
in Graceland—for them, it's their church service.
Part of the appeal of Graceland is that older people
go there—Graceland is the service I attend, too.
But for the high schoolers who go there, when it comes
to breaking down into small groups, it's the high school
ministry that connects them. They're student-led and
adult-coached. There's also a student-led, Sunday morning
high school service.
I find that Graceland—being that it's designed
as a ministry for kids who've graduated from high school—appeals
mostly to eleventh and twelfth graders. The ninth and
tenth graders don't attend as much.
But the great thing about Graceland is that it's become
a place from where we can draw adult leaders—an
army of workers for junor and senior high ministries.
—Ron Marsh is the pastor of high school ministries
at Santa Crua Bible Church
© 2001 CCM Communications
Permission is granted to distribute Youthworker articles
to other youth workers within your church, but may not
be re-published (print or electronic) without permission.
This article is found on http://www.Youthworker.com
|